Yet another senseless attempt to change something in the aniblogosphere

And I’m not going to do it. But see­ing the site fall in silence isn’t mak­ing me feel good. Aizen doesn’t watch any anime, and who knows when he’ll post some­thing again, Ammy & Llora post very rarely, and I am, as expressed by many, ‘fad­ing away’…

We need an addi­tional author. Now. A con­stant one. You can do epis­odics if your under­stand­ing of an ‘epis­odic’ is not just a sum­mary of an epis­ode. You are free, and encour­aged to, write edit­or­i­als, rants, long posts… Import­ant is that it stays inter­est­ing to read. The top­ics may be everything from the anib­lo­go­sphere and everything from the webdesign-o-sphere. In fact, in mat­ters of topic choos­ing you can con­sider your­self hav­ing as much free­dom in writ­ing on this site as I do.

Of course you have to be able to get the images for your posts by your­self, and in good qual­ity. But that ain’t dif­fi­cult, really.

Come on, raise your hands. I know there are people with amaz­ing writ­ing skills lurk­ing out there. Join in, con­quer the inter­webs with us!

Yup, let’s go. (Btw there’ll be a second sea­son for K-ON!). Art­work author: see ‘Fur­ther reading’

Fur­ther reading

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
This entry was posted in Asides. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

24 Comments

  1. Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:00 | Permalink

    I’ll write for you.

    just kid­ding!

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:04 | Permalink

      I don’t await your first post by tomorrow.

      Just kid­ding.

  2. Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:39 | Permalink

    Hope­fully he/she is Pedant-proof.

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:55 | Permalink

      Hope­fully.

  3. Ryan A 51
    Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:47 | Permalink

    Booor­ing. This might be tough… but good luck.

    /slaps @lelangir
    Ryan A´s last blog post: Dreams of the Year Behind: 2009 Series

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 2, 2010 at 20:56 | Permalink

      Bor­ing.. post? announce­ment? blog? me?

      • Ryan A 51
        Posted January 5, 2010 at 18:17 | Permalink

        The announce­ment, not the blog or you :) from my exper­i­ences, people are never bor­ing, but some­times what they do, is.

        I’ll state my beef that there has been this trend for the 2008/9 crop of blog­gers to post request­ing other writers for some reason… I’m not exactly sure what that’s about; blog neg­lect. Your case isn’t the same since you just don’t want to gen­er­ate con­tent (here) but still would like to focus on design/maintenance. It’s just… (see OH! debacle)

        Blogs are a valid social net­work (my primary social net­work), so to me this is the equi­val­ent of perma­log­ging off face­book or sim­ilar. The dif­fer­ence is that blogs don’t glue you to the net­work… open.

        Oh btw, if you want to look into some­thing inter­est­ing, check out rssCloud or real­time rss. Very cool.

        • RP 22
          Posted January 6, 2010 at 08:32 | Permalink

          Oh Ryan, while we’re talk­ing about geeky stuff, have you had any exper­i­ence with Pub­hub­sub. And any idea on how it com­pares to rssCloud or real­time rss?

          • Ryan A 51
            Posted January 6, 2010 at 16:12 | Permalink

            I’ve read the doc­u­ment­a­tion for pub­sub­hub, and glanced rssCloud. They are basic­ally the same concept, although rssCloud was being designed in 2001 or so.

            The main dif­fer­ences are the back­ers. Google is back­ing pub­sub­hub, while rssCloud has vari­ous adop­ters, includ­ing Wordpress.

            Okay, that’s not the main dif­fer­ence, because pub­sub­hub nat­ur­ally caters to a dis­trib­uted model (the hub), while rssCloud seems to be more p2p without hubs.

            Both are trouble­some because they don’t enforce author­iz­a­tion in the spe­cific­a­tion (though it can be done), which means you might get spoofed data (spam) if your client/subscription ser­vice is accept­ing pay­loads rather than notifications.

            The trouble with noti­fic­a­tions is that when the pub­lisher (blog) updates, it sends out the noti­fic­a­tion to sub­scribers. This noti­fic­a­tion just tells sub­scribers than there is an update on the given RSS feed, and then sub­scribers fetch the pay­load (instant DDOS).

            Hubs act like a wall to keep highly pop­u­lar sources from over­load­ing, where rssCloud would need to use a feed proxy or some­thing to not be ham­mer on every update with a large num­ber of listeners.

            Most cases rssCloud is going to be easier to imple­ment because there is no hub. Although the feed and the hub can be on the same server, both need to be there for pub­sub­hub to work.

            At least, that is what I’ve seen.
            Ryan A´s last blog post: Winter 2010: Sound of the Skies

            • RP 22
              Posted January 7, 2010 at 05:33 | Permalink

              So it sounds like both specs are depend­ent on whether or not the sub­scriber (or reader) sup­ports it. If the sub­scriber doesn’t fetch the pay­load in real-time, then the bene­fits are lost. Is that cor­rect?
              RP´s last blog post: Intro­du­cing Lib­era! A shoujo with a ser­i­ously shonen kick

              • Ryan A 51
                Posted January 26, 2010 at 20:23 | Permalink

                Yes, indeed. Although, most ser­vices can imple­ment both without any prob.

                I for­got to men­tion there is one large dif­fer­ence between the two and that is rssCloud requires “pings” to tell the pub­lisher that someone is still sub­scribed, oth­er­wise rssCloud sub­scrip­tions expire after 24 hrs.

                Nuts. right.
                Ryan A´s last blog post: Sea­sons and Slice

        • Ryan A 51
          Posted January 7, 2010 at 19:42 | Permalink

          Rp, that’s the nature of a spe­cific­a­tion (stand­ard) :) Stand­ards, and things pro­posed as stand­ards, are not instances, but concepts/abstractions that are fol­lowed (this is my basis for argu­ment that a given “ser­vice” can never be called a “standard”).

          Any­how, in concept it is very simple. RSS cli­ent (desktop/3pa) sits there and checks for noti­fic­a­tion updates from it’s ser­vice domain, which man­ages sub­scrip­tion to the rtRSS. When the ser­vice domain gives a heads up to the cli­ent, the cli­ent then checks the noti­fic­a­tion feed.

          This is rel­at­ively safe because even if a noti­fic­a­tion is spoofed, the cli­ent is going back to the ori­ginal source to check. Then again, if 1000s of sub­scribers are get­ting fake noti­fic­a­tions, and check­ing the feed, that could be used against the feed pub­lisher (ddos).

          Some dan­ger­ous things to con­sider, but there are ways to fix that with “hubs” that verify the feed update before noti­fy­ing subscribers.

          Essen­tially things are hap­pen­ing in real­time, but with these tech­no­lo­gies (TCP) it is prop­erly called near-real-time.

  4. Posted January 2, 2010 at 21:27 | Permalink

    Soun­ded tempt­ing, untill I read the part where it had to stay inter­est­ing and the writer had to have actual skill.

    That, and I have my own blog.

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:07 | Permalink

      Don’t be shy.

  5. Posted January 2, 2010 at 23:33 | Permalink

    I’d do it if I didn’t already have a blog. :P I hope you find someone though. I was won­der­ing how well this place was going to fare once you slow down, since it’s usu­ally you updat­ing at the moment as it is.
    mefloraine´s last blog post: K-on! Sea­son 2

  6. Posted January 3, 2010 at 03:15 | Permalink

    But ser­i­ously if your blogging-strategy is start­ing to fail, innov­ate! What is “con­tent?” Per­haps you need to rethink your fun­da­mental con­cepts of blog­ging in order to keep up with evol­u­tion in the sphere.
    lelangir´s last blog post: on Full Metal “Alchem­ist”

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:06 | Permalink

      But ser­i­ously, it’s not my strategy start­ing to fail, it’s me start­ing to leave. learn2read

  7. Posted January 3, 2010 at 08:56 | Permalink

    Ah, some­thing that is within my res­ol­u­tion! Then again, I’m sorely lacked of ideas to write for other blogs, so if I find any­thing I’ll let ya know?
    jusuchin85´s last blog post: 2010: A New Year Res­ol­u­tions Spe­cial

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 3, 2010 at 11:08 | Permalink

      Yeah. Though, I’d like to find a con­stant author this time, not a guest one.

  8. Kairu 59
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 12:32 | Permalink

    >Btw there’ll be a second sea­son for K-ON!

    Did I miss some­thing!?
    Kairu´s last blog post: It’s the new year… and you know what that means…

    • Eugen R. 484
      Posted January 3, 2010 at 13:37 | Permalink

      Did you really miss the news that K-ON! got green­light for a second season?

  9. Guy 1
    Posted January 3, 2010 at 13:59 | Permalink

    Good luck, but it seems it’s the same old prob­lem, if someone already writes, they have their own blog, if they don’t already have their own blog, it’s unlikely they’ll begin writ­ing and could be expec­ted to hold on to it…
    Guy´s last blog post: Loli (Puppy) in a Box!

  10. Posted January 3, 2010 at 14:02 | Permalink

    I’ve been curi­ous about writ­ing on another blog before… but my writ­ing is nowhere near any­thing that’s enough to make do than what’s on the pic­ture. So it stays within the con­fines of my blog for now ^^;

    I’ll give you a hoot if I think I can do it one day.
    lightningsabre´s last blog post: A Happy New Year to You All!

One Trackback

  1. […] Healer Rogue War­rior writer are there in his post.  Apply for the pos­i­tion o’er at his post there at Anime2, or Tweet him ’bout it. This one took longer. It IS the lar­ger of the two. My favorite. […]

Post a Comment

Do not spam. Do not name yourself after website names. To have an avatar, register at gravatar. Note: your e-mail will never be published or used, it is needed only to ensure you're not a spambot.

Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Subscribe without commenting