Steampunk

Ladies and gen­tle­men, I have some­thing to announce. When I came to my senses not long ago, I found myself deep in a heap of cogs, springs and screws, and the air was hot and wet from all the steam around. And I loved it. I have finally found some­thing to answer on music genre pref­er­ences ques­tions, same goes for anime and films. I love Steam­punk, and this intim­ate hoot­ing affec­tion has no plans of going away too eas­ily. Where­with I am thor­oughly happy.

Steam­punk is an inter­me­dial genre that can be viewed as the oppos­ite of cyber­punk. While cyber­punk revolves around the electricity-driven future, steam­punk is the essence of false hopes in the 18th and 19th cen­tur­ies, when the people believed the power of steam and ima­gined all kinds of machines powered by it. You could say it’s the sci-fi of those ages, and the cult of the loud and hot machines is weak nowadays, yet it lives through, and maybe it will occupy wider masses some­when again.

My first ever steam­punk exper­i­ence was Miyazaki’s Laputa, shortafter one of my favour­ites, Steam­boy, and of course Howl’s Mov­ing Castle. But they didn’t get me ‘into’ the genre. What did it was music. Begin­ning with the self-proclaimed world emperor Dr. Steel, then the nar­rat­or­ish Clock­work Dolls, fast fad­ing into the fab­ulous Clock­work Quar­tet, fol­lowed by the Ver­nian Pro­cess. Out of these I would like to point your atten­tion to the Clock­work Quar­tet, which is a rel­at­ively new band that needs atten­tion and sup­port, and whilst it is the case for every god­damn band on the Earth’s sur­face and under, this one totally deserves it.

I am cur­rently com­pil­ing a list of all steam­punk anime, through which I will go to become one of the so rare steam­punk con­nois­seurs in the ani­sphere. My help in the com­pil­ing are for­ums, chats, friends and acquaint­ances and of course data­bases (which often have the desired tag miss­ing). It seems like there are only a hand­ful of anime series and films inspired by steam­punk, but that just makes it easier for me to watch them all. Since the inform­a­tion sources are uncon­firmed, I can­not put the list up yet. But I plan on doing so right after I fin­ish my steamy mara­thon and grow out of the puns I seem to not stop intending.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

17 Comments

  1. chii 2
    Posted January 30, 2010 at 19:04 | Permalink

    Hope you enjoy the few yet awe­some titles this small genre has to offer ^_^
    chii´s last blog post: 365 Days of Anime Char­ac­ters: Day 29/365 Olivie

  2. Ryan A 67
    Posted January 30, 2010 at 19:46 | Permalink

    Sweet! I never really got into steam­punk through vari­ous medi­ums, but music intrigues.

    Massive steam mara­thon, lol. That sounds intense btw.
    Ryan A´s last blog post: Winter 2010: おおかみかくし

  3. Scamp 19
    Posted January 30, 2010 at 20:18 | Permalink

    LAST EXILE!!!!!!!!!!
    Scamp´s last blog post: Dur­arara epis­ode 4

    • Eugen R. 520
      Posted February 1, 2010 at 00:38 | Permalink

      I have now watched the first epis­ode of this show, and I hate to tell this but I do not agree on the exclam­a­tion marks, and even the caps are too exaggerating.

      Per­haps it is partly your fault that I expec­ted some­thing great of this anime but instead got some ‘rastueku­sairu’. I could write a post on why I was so much dis­ap­poin­ted, but I will save up stuff for a post after I fin­ish it, so I’ll list it right here:

      1. Emo­tions. This is not GITS where all main char­ac­ters are in fact dolls. They are alive, yet still, they open their mouth without mov­ing any­thing else. Like dolls.

      2. Lazi­ness. Way too much blatant CGI there, and when I say blatant, I mean blatant. I know Steam­boy was made for 10 years, but look at it, could you even say that was CGI? No. And here it is not only blatant CGI, but poorly-made CGI at that.

      3. Through the whole 24 minutes I sat and thought, ‘this must be how the Japan­ese think Europeans/British are’

      I know I’m going to get budget com­par­ison punch­lines now. But budget or not, I am disappoint.

    • Shion 161
      Posted February 1, 2010 at 04:15 | Permalink

      I hereby award this debate: Awe­some.
      Shion´s last blog post: Box updates

      • Eugen R. 520
        Posted February 1, 2010 at 16:17 | Permalink

        This ain’t a debate (yet).

  4. Posted January 30, 2010 at 20:40 | Permalink

    What Scamp said; Last Exile is one of my favor­ite shows, steam­punk or no.

    While cyber­punk revolves around the electricity-driven future, steam­punk is the essence of false hopes in the 18th and 19th cen­tur­ies, when the people believed into the power of steam and ima­gined all kinds of machines powered by it.

    It’s funny how that turned out, actu­ally. Cyber­punk also ended up being about “false hopes” for the power of tech­no­logy and mass media. I mean, it’s cer­tainly the case that big busi­ness is power­ful and the media is every­where, but we haven’t become dysto­pian because of it, as the early cyber­punk writers pre­dicted. We even have “post-cyberpunk” now, which deals with the issues of cyber­punk in a less bleak and more recog­niz­able way.

    • Eugen R. 520
      Posted January 30, 2010 at 21:18 | Permalink

      While you have a good point there, I feel like I should say that we didn’t yet reach the time described in most cyber­punk works. The first year that comes to my mind is 2033, but even so, cyber­punk is not described by the age but by the tech­no­lo­gical pro­gress. That means, we will reach cyber­punk as soon as we will reach the tech­no­lo­gical fea­tures described in cyber­punk works. So we still have it ahead of us.

      • Posted January 31, 2010 at 04:11 | Permalink

        No, we aren’t quite there yet. I didn’t mean to imply that cyber­punk is “over,” per se. But we’ve become cor­por­ate, inter­con­nec­ted, and media-saturated in a way that resembles some stage in the pro­cess toward some­thing Gib­sonian. What I should have said was that, con­sid­er­ing post-cyberpunk writers, there are some who would say that the tra­di­tional cyber­punk dysto­pia is no longer all that likely, that it was a res­ult of some­thing like over­es­tim­a­tion (if not false hope, neces­sar­ily, given that many cyber­punk set­tings come off as almost cautionary).

        Of course, it’s debat­able whether “post-cyberpunk” is an accur­ate label for what it describes. Maybe what we’re see­ing is simply an exten­sion of cyber­punk — or a rolling-back into the nearer-future.

        • Eugen R. 520
          Posted January 31, 2010 at 14:42 | Permalink

          Sadly each con­ver­sa­tion finds its end when both sides agree on the sub­ject of their dis­cus­sion. I agree with you for the most part.

          How­ever, many of the pre­dic­tions of early sci-fi/cyberpunk authors, (espe­cially in lit­er­at­ure) indeed came true up until now. If you’ll look into Tokyo with those high glass-buildings, huge mon­it­ors trans­mit­ting news and ads, you would earlier rather than later think on the world of Blade Runner.

          Onto post-cyberpunk, in my view, post-cyberpunk would describe the age after the self-destruction of cyber­punk, which is pre­dicted in so many works (and even in real­ity, given all the nuc­lear weapons ready to launch every second). Cor­rect me if I’m wrong, sadly I’m not very famil­iar with post-cyberpunk.

          • Posted February 1, 2010 at 01:47 | Permalink

            But that media sat­ur­a­tion hasn’t turned us into zom­bies — well, argu­ably it hasn’t. Cyber­punk seems to have pre­dicted our cur­rent way of life in a pess­im­istic and sim­pli­fied way that doesn’t take into account the com­plex­ity behind and res­ult­ant from media and tech­no­logy, or so the cri­ti­cism seems to go.

            Well, they call it “post” cyber­punk, but based on what I’ve read it doesn’t seem to take place after what we’d think of as the cyber­punk era. More than any­thing it’s just less pess­im­istic cyber­punk with tech­no­logy closer to what we have now. Lit­er­at­ure after the cyber­punk col­lapse seems to fall more squarely into sci­ence fic­tion “proper,” but maybe I’m wrong; the only example I can think of right now is Dune, with its But­lerian Jihad vs. computers.

            • Eugen R. 520
              Posted February 1, 2010 at 16:16 | Permalink

              Mat­rix would be another example if I’m not mistaken.

              Back to the actual cyber­punk, indeed it is argu­ably. If people buy­ing the whole End­less Eight DVD set aren’t media zom­bies, then who is?

              The com­plex­ity behind utterly depends on the actual work. I have read Isaac Asimov’s books long ago, so maybe some­thing escapes my focus, but I think those sci-fi go under the cat­egory you described. But tak­ing the same earlier men­tioned Ghost in the Shell you can’t quite say it doesn’t take the com­plex­ity behind into account — the film(s) dis­cuss social issues in the new age, and the ques­tion of human­ity in the world where the only liv­ing thing in the body of a human child is his brain.

              How­ever, I can’t argue with that all of cyber­punk works give us warnings.

              • Posted February 3, 2010 at 11:12 | Permalink

                I’m not cri­ti­ciz­ing “pure” cyber­punk myself, as there really are some great examples of it out there. I’m just try­ing to encap­su­late the argu­ment for post-cyberpunk. I tend to judge things on a case-by-case basis, as you sug­gest, though I do find genre interesting.

                For the record, I was really, genu­inely enter­tained by End­less Eight :p Not that I’m over­eager to watch it again some time soon. I’m not really well-versed enough on com­mu­nic­a­tions the­ory yet to talk about the effect of media, but I think the field is pretty mod­er­ate right now — that is, we aren’t com­plete slaves to the media, but we’re affected by it in subtle and indir­ect ways.

                On second thought, I really should’ve star­ted a new com­ment thread. This column is get­ting a little cramped…

  5. Posted February 2, 2010 at 01:18 | Permalink

    Thanks for the shout, we’re busy pro­du­cing a bunch of excit­ing stuff, just hang onto your hats for a few months…

    Fol­low our shenanigans at
    http://www.facebook.com/ClockworkQuartet and http://www.twitter.com/ClockwrkQuartet

    • Eugen R. 520
      Posted February 2, 2010 at 01:57 | Permalink

      Oh, thanks for drop­ping by! This was rather unex­pec­ted, actually.

      I’m happy you still show signs of life after your latest blog post was on the 9th of Octo­ber. (But I didn’t know you had Twit­ter, so I guess it replaced the blog somehow?)

      P.S. You’re only allowed to use the band name as name here because you make such beau­ti­ful music; every­body else who’s read­ing this: the rule’s still there for you!

  6. Posted February 18, 2010 at 05:57 | Permalink

    Heard the word steam­punk on mtv many years ago. Now, it faded like flower.
    Xan­dra Hasegawa´s last blog post: How to Screw Up Your Rela­tion­ship with a Japan­ese Woman

    • Eugen R. 520
      Posted February 18, 2010 at 19:15 | Permalink

      We will revive it, for sure.

One Trackback

  1. […] Clock­work Quar­tetYes, you did read the head­line right — I have an inter­view for you, with the pre­vi­ously men­tioned, and heav­ily emphas­ized Clock­work Quar­tet, or spe­cific­ally, its pro­du­cer: Edward […]

Post a Comment

Do not spam. Do not name yourself after website names. To have an avatar, register at gravatar. Note: your e-mail will never be published or used, it is needed only to ensure you're not a spambot.

Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv Enabled

Subscribe without commenting